Thursday, February 12, 2009
Similar to President Obama's broken promise to publicly post non-emergency legislation for comment for five days before signing, Congressional Democrats have broken their promise to allow 48 hours of public review of the Stimulus Bill before putting it to a vote.
In a press conference Thursday, the House Republican leadership spoke candidly about being kept out of the House-Senate conference on the Obama-Pelosi-Reid so-called “economic stimulus” bill. They confirmed they had not yet seen the text of the bill as of 4 p.m.

Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said he was unsure how many Democrats would vote with Republicans again on this bill but that he thought Republicans “may get a few” Democrats to side with them. The fact that the Demos have now broken their promise to have the public able to see the bill for 48 hours may drive more Dems into the Republican camp.

“[I] don’t know, ‘cause they haven’t seen the bill either,” Boehner said.

“The American people have a right to know what’s in this bill,” Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind) told HUMAN EVENTS after the press conference. “Every member of Congress -- Republicans and Democrats -- voted to post this bill on the internet for 48 hours, 48 hours ago. We’ll see if the Democrats keep their word.”

Actually -- as of 5:15 pm, the Democrats had broken their word. The stimulus bill -- which we still haven’t seen -- will be released late tonight and will be brought up on the House floor at 9 am tomorrow.
There's also this exchange which amused me greatly, mainly because it took place over Twitter.
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) twittered, "Don't know when we're going to vote. Will the no votes delay vote just because they can? Speed is important. They know that."

House Republican Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) twittered back, “Those in favor of speed over commonsense may just be afraid of letting the People know what they are ramming through.”
Feb 12, 2009 7:40 PM (EDT)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Friday, February 06, 2009
From the AP:
President Barack Obama decried as "inexcusable and irresponsible" the delay of his economic recovery legislation in Congress with an estimated 3.6 million Americans losing their jobs since the recession began.
Well now he's just throwing a Presidential temper tantrum.
Obama's remarks were some of his most direct and pointed in support of the massive economic package that the Senate considered Friday and tried to pare down below its $900-billion-plus price tag. Obama acknowledged it was not perfect and pledged to work with lawmakers to refine the measure, which he called "absolutely necessary."

"But broadly speaking, the package is the right size, it is the right scope, and it has the right priorities to create 3 to 4 million jobs, and to do it in a way that lays the groundwork for long-term growth," Obama said at a ceremony in the White House East Room.
"work with lawmakers to refine the measure" how? Once it's passed, it's passed. THIS is the time to refine the measure, which is exactly what's going on. You can't order people to pass it and then say you'll work on afterwards.
"These numbers demand action. It is inexcusable and irresponsible for any of us to get bogged down in distraction, delay or politics as usual while millions of Americans are being put out of work," Obama said bluntly. "Now is the time for Congress to act."
So pass it! What do you want from me? You have the votes, you have the majority! Pass it! Or are you having trouble from some people on your side of the aisle?
Borrowing themes from an address the night before to fellow Democrats on retreat in Williamsburg, Va., Obama reminded lawmakers that voters gave them the White House and control of Congress.

"They did not choose more of the same in November," Obama said Friday. "They did not send us to Washington to get stuck in partisan posturing, to try to score political points. They did not send us here to turn back to the same tried and failed approaches that were rejected because we saw the results. They sent us here to make change with the expectation that we would act."
Ah, there's the bipartisan spirit! "People didn't elect you Republicans to exercise your beliefs and do what you think is right! Every single member of Congress was elected in 2008 to do exactly what I say!"
Feb 6, 2009 1:08 PM (EDT)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
From the Washington Post this morning. Yes, the Washington Post.
"A failure to act, and act now, will turn crisis into a catastrophe."

-- President Obama, Feb. 4.

Catastrophe, mind you. So much for the president who in his inaugural address two weeks earlier declared "we have chosen hope over fear." Until, that is, you need fear to pass a bill.

And so much for the promise to banish the money changers and influence peddlers from the temple. An ostentatious executive order banning lobbyists was immediately followed by the nomination of at least a dozen current or former lobbyists to high position. Followed by a Treasury secretary who allegedly couldn't understand the payroll tax provisions in his 1040. Followed by Tom Daschle, who had to fall on his sword according to the new Washington rule that no Cabinet can have more than one tax delinquent.

And yet more damaging to Obama's image than all the hypocrisies in the appointment process is his signature bill: the stimulus package. He inexplicably delegated the writing to Nancy Pelosi and the barons of the House. The product, which inevitably carries Obama's name, was not just bad, not just flawed, but a legislative abomination.

It's not just pages and pages of special-interest tax breaks, giveaways and protections, one of which would set off a ruinous Smoot-Hawley trade war. It's not just the waste, such as the $88.6 million for new construction for Milwaukee Public Schools, which, reports the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, have shrinking enrollment, 15 vacant schools and, quite logically, no plans for new construction.

It's the essential fraud of rushing through a bill in which the normal rules (committee hearings, finding revenue to pay for the programs) are suspended on the grounds that a national emergency requires an immediate job-creating stimulus -- and then throwing into it hundreds of billions that have nothing to do with stimulus, that Congress's own budget office says won't be spent until 2011 and beyond, and that are little more than the back-scratching, special-interest, lobby-driven parochialism that Obama came to Washington to abolish. He said.
Considering how little will be spent this year, I really think we could keep the normal rules in place rather than just ramming it through Congress. Of course the big story is that there's any ramming at all.

It's a bad start, really. When the GOP took Congress in 1994, they at least had a period where they got a lot done - fulfilling the Contract with America. The Dems have the White House and Congress with almost a supermajority and they've already started fighting right out of the gate. This is crushing any momentum they may have had and will likely severely hamper any of President Obama's legislative aspirations.
Feb 6, 2009 10:36 AM (EDT)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Thursday, February 05, 2009
On the off chance anyone's expecting an account and commentary on the infanticide case in Florida that came out today, I'm going to have to disappoint you. Quite honestly I can't even bear to reread the story or provide a link. It sickens me more than I can say right now. Despite my usual ability to find another side or some excuse for something, I'm failing here. Every single fact is just more terrible than the last. The only thing I'd have to add is that I hope this is a very isolated incident.
Feb 5, 2009 5:57 PM (EDT)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Wednesday, February 04, 2009
Tax cuts for huge corporations and the wealthy are bad for the economy, we're told. They don't stimulate the economy and just help the rich get richer. Except...
Senate Republicans yesterday stripped a special $246 million tax break for Hollywood producers from President Obama's stimulus package.

"This isn't stimulus. This is a gift," said Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), who wrote the amendment to strike out the giveaway for some of the Democrats' most generous political supporters.

"It's not going to stimulate the economy at all," he said. "What it's going to do is line the pockets of very wealthy individuals already not experiencing the downside of the economy."

The 52-45 vote was largely along party lines, with nearly every Republican voting to remove the Hollywood tax break, joined by 13 Democrats and independent Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman.

Under the measure, Hollywood moguls would have been allowed to write off half the production and filming costs of big-budget films and TV shows.

Backed by Walt Disney and the Motion Picture Association of America, the provision amounted to an estimated $246 million tax break over 11 years.

The entertainment industry gave nearly $20 million in campaign contributions to Democrats during the 2008 election cycle, according to OpenSecrets.org.
Shocking.
Feb 4, 2009 4:00 PM (EDT)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback